2002 • Great Wall
Safe
Great Wall Safe 2.2i (105 Hp) 2002Overall Score59.5/100
2002 Great Wall Safe vs 2002 MG ZS Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • MG
ZS
MG ZS 2.0 TDi (113 Hp) 2002Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZS
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMG ZS
Great WallMakeMG
SafeModelZS
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMG ZS
—0–100 km/h9,5 s
140 km/hTop speed193 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption7,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMG ZS
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Great Wall SafeSpecificationMG ZS
4860 mmLength4520 mm
—Width1700 mm
1820 mmHeight1390 mm
1640 KgWeight1225 Kg
—Wheelbase2620 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Great Wall Safe and 2002 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSRover 25 vs Great Wall Safe2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZR vs Great Wall Safe2002 and 2002 model yearsImage unavailableVSMG ZS vs Great Wall Safe2002 and 2002 model years
VSRover 45 vs Great Wall Safe2002 and 2002 model years
VSHyundai H-1 vs Great Wall Safe2002 and 2002 model yearsComments are loading…