DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Great Wall Safe vs 2002 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMG
SafeModelZR
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
140 km/hTop speed185 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
105 HPPower113 HP
190 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4860 mmLength4011 mm
—Width1690 mm
1820 mmHeight1400 mm
1640 KgWeight1155 Kg
—Wheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Great Wall Safe and 2002 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…