DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 Great Wall RUV vs 2009 Opel Antara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Antara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeOpel
RUVModelAntara
2009Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5-7Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,9 s
0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
2237 ccEngine displacement2405 cc
105 HPPower150 HP
190 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank0 lt
—Urban consumption13,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,3 lt
—Average consumption9,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
—Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5105 mmLength4575 mm
1785 mmWidth1850 mm
1870 mmHeight1704 mm
1670 KgWeight—
3025 mmWheelbase2707 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 Great Wall RUV and 2009 Opel Antara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Antara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…