DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Great Wall Peri vs 2010 Suzuki Jimny Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Peri

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

46.25–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeSuzuki
PeriModelJimny
2010Model year2010
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
4Seats4
5Doors3

Performance

17,0 s0–100 km/h17,0 s
160 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1342 ccEngine displacement1461 cc
88 HPPower86 HP
115 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
35 ltFuel tank40 lt
7 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
6 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
6,5 ltAverage consumption6,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
—Gears5
165/70 R14Tyre size205/70 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3548 mmLength3395 mm
1580 mmWidth1475 mm
1544 mmHeight1660 mm
981 KgWeight1050 Kg
—Wheelbase2250 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Great Wall Peri and 2010 Suzuki Jimny approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Peri leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…