DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Great Wall Hover H6 vs 2016 Mazda 3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.5–65.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMazda
Hover H6Model3
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
180 km/hTop speed195 km/h
1996 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower120 HP
310 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
58 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption6,5 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
6,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size205/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4640 mmLength4460 mm
1825 mmWidth1795 mm
1745 mmHeight1450 mm
—Weight1205 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Great Wall Hover H6 and 2016 Mazda 3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…