2010 • Great Wall
Hover CUV
Great Wall Hover CUV Hover 2.8 TD (95 Hp) 2010Overall Score46.5/100
2010 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2009 GAZ 31 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2009 • GAZ
31
GAZ 31 3102 2.5 (90 Hp) 2009Overall Score45.5/100
WINNER
Great Wall Hover CUV
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.5–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Great Wall Hover CUVSpecificationGAZ 31
Great WallMakeGAZ
Hover CUVModel31
2010Model year2009
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Great Wall Hover CUVSpecificationGAZ 31
28,0 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
145 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
225 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Great Wall Hover CUVSpecificationGAZ 31
DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Great Wall Hover CUVSpecificationGAZ 31
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Great Wall Hover CUVSpecificationGAZ 31
4620 mmLength4960 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1775 mmHeight1422 mm
1840 KgWeight1450 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2800 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2010 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2009 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSComments are loading…