DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2008 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.5–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeGAZ
Hover CUVModel31
2008Model year2008
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

28,0 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
145 km/hTop speed147 km/h
2771 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
95 HPPower90 HP
225 NmTorque174 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank70 lt
—Urban consumption15 lt
—Average consumption9,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4960 mm
1800 mmWidth1800 mm
1775 mmHeight1422 mm
1840 KgWeight1450 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2008 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…