DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2011 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeVolvo
Hover CUVModelV50
2011Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h9,6 s
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement1999 cc
130 HPPower145 HP
192 NmTorque185 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption10,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
10 ltAverage consumption7,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4522 mm
1800 mmWidth1845 mm
1775 mmHeight1457 mm
1830 KgWeight1381 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2011 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…