DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2012 Mahindra Xylo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeMahindra
Hover CUVModelXylo
2011Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSUV
5Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h16,0 s
170 km/hTop speed160 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2179 cc
130 HPPower120 HP
192 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
74 ltFuel tank55 lt
14 ltUrban consumption—
10 ltAverage consumption7,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size215/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4520 mm
1800 mmWidth1850 mm
1775 mmHeight1905 mm
1830 KgWeight—
2700 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2012 Mahindra Xylo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…