DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 Great Wall Hover CUV vs 2007 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Hover CUV

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeVolvo
Hover CUVModelV50
2007Model year2007
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,0 s0–100 km/h10,7 s
170 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2351 ccEngine displacement2435 cc
130 HPPower140 HP
192 NmTorque220 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank62 lt
14 ltUrban consumption13,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
10 ltAverage consumption9,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
235/65 R17Tyre size—
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4620 mmLength4522 mm
1800 mmWidth1845 mm
1775 mmHeight1457 mm
1830 KgWeight1335 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 Great Wall Hover CUV and 2007 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Hover CUV leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…