DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 Great Wall Cowry vs 2013 Jeep Cherokee Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeJeep
CowryModelCherokee
2013Model year2013
MinivanBody typeSUV
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,3 s
170 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1956 cc
143 HPPower170 HP
185 NmTorque350 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption7,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,1 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears9
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size225/60 R17; 225/55 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4624 mm
1704 mmWidth1859 mm
1845 mmHeight1670 mm
1510 KgWeight1953 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 Great Wall Cowry and 2013 Jeep Cherokee approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…