DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2008 Great Wall Cowry vs 2008 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Great Wall Cowry

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

66.25–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Great WallMakeSaab
CowryModel9-3
2008Model year2008
MinivanBody typeEstate
8Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,2 s
170 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
143 HPPower150 HP
185 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank62 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,9 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/65 R15; 205/55 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4654 mm
1704 mmWidth1782 mm
1845 mmHeight1507 mm
1510 KgWeight1405 Kg
2825 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2008 Great Wall Cowry and 2008 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Great Wall Cowry leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…