DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Yukon vs 2004 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeCadillac
YukonModelEscalade
2006Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
9Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed174 km/h
6162 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
385 HPPower349 HP
563 NmTorque515 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank98 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption19,6 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption16,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears4
265/60 R18Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength5052 mm
2007 mmWidth2004 mm
1956 mmHeight1885 mm
—Weight2635 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Yukon and 2004 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…