DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Yukon vs 2004 Bristol Blenheim Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Bristol Blenheim

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeBristol
YukonModelBlenheim
2006Model year2004
Off-road vehicleBody typeCoupe
9Seats4
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,4 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
6162 ccEngine displacement5900 cc
385 HPPower390 HP
563 NmTorque500 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank82 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption18 lt
12,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears4
265/60 R18Tyre size225/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5130 mmLength4825 mm
2007 mmWidth1765 mm
1956 mmHeight1440 mm
—Weight1755 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2900 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Yukon and 2004 Bristol Blenheim approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Bristol Blenheim leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…