DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 GMC Yukon vs 2002 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

82.5–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeCadillac
YukonModelEscalade
2002Model year2002
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
9Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
156 km/hTop speed174 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5967 cc
324 HPPower349 HP
502 NmTorque515 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
146 ltFuel tank98 lt
—Urban consumption19,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption14,7 lt
—Average consumption16,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength5052 mm
2002 mmWidth2004 mm
1923 mmHeight1885 mm
2310 KgWeight2635 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 GMC Yukon and 2002 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…