DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 GMC Yukon vs 2011 Chrysler 300 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeChrysler
YukonModel300
2006Model year2011
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
9Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

10,2 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
156 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
324 HPPower363 HP
502 NmTorque527 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
123 ltFuel tank72 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size215/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength5066 mm
2002 mmWidth1902 mm
1923 mmHeight1462 mm
2400 KgWeight1937 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase3052 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 GMC Yukon and 2011 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…