DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 GMC Yukon vs 2015 Nissan Titan Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

81.75–80.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeNissan
YukonModelTitan
2010Model year2015
Off-road vehicleBody typePick-up
9Seats5/6
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5967 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
359 HPPower390 HP
495 NmTorque394 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
119 ltFuel tank98 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears7
265/70 R17Tyre size245/75 R17; 275/65 R18; 265/60 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5648 mmLength6165-6187 mm
2007 mmWidth2019-2050 mm
1951 mmHeight1981-2002 mm
2630 KgWeight2847-3033 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase3551 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 GMC Yukon and 2015 Nissan Titan approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…