DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 GMC Yukon vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeNissan
YukonModelArmada
2003Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
9Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
288 HPPower305 HP
440 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
123 ltFuel tank106 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
245/75 R16Tyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5570 mmLength5255 mm
2002 mmWidth2002 mm
1923 mmHeight1913 mm
2310 KgWeight2340 Kg
3302 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 GMC Yukon and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…