DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GMC Yukon vs 1999 Holden Caprice Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

78.75–77.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeHolden
YukonModelCaprice
2000Model year1999
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,7 s
0 km/hTop speed230 km/h
5327 ccEngine displacement5665 cc
288 HPPower306 HP
440 NmTorque460 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption14 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size225/55 R16V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5042 mmLength5237 mm
2004 mmWidth1847 mm
1948 mmHeight1459 mm
2250 KgWeight1735 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2939 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GMC Yukon and 1999 Holden Caprice approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…