DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Yukon vs 2005 Ford Mustang Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Yukon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

79.5–78.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
YukonModelMustang
2004Model year2005
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h5,5 s
156 km/hTop speed220 km/h
4807 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
278 HPPower263 HP
393 NmTorque302 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
98 ltFuel tank59 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
245/75 R16Tyre size205/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5029 mmLength4653 mm
2004 mmWidth1857 mm
1943 mmHeight1350 mm
2350 KgWeight1550 Kg
2946 mmWheelbase2573 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Yukon and 2005 Ford Mustang approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Yukon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…