DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 GMC Terrain vs 2012 Jaguar XF Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jaguar XF

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJaguar
TerrainModelXF
2015Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,1 s
0 km/hTop speed240 km/h
2997 ccEngine displacement2993 cc
264 HPPower240 HP
301 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
79 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption7,5 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,0 lt
11,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears8
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength4961 mm
1849 mmWidth1939 mm
1684 mmHeight1468 mm
1769 KgWeight1770 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2909 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 GMC Terrain and 2012 Jaguar XF approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jaguar XF leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…