DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 GMC Terrain vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMitsubishi
TerrainModelTriton
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
182 HPPower136 HP
232 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
68 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,7 ltUrban consumption—
7,4 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
235/60 R17; 235/55 R18; 235/55 R19Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4771 mmLength5280 mm
1849 mmWidth1815 mm
1684 mmHeight1780 mm
1748 KgWeight1820 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 GMC Terrain and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…