DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 GMC Terrain vs 2014 Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

70.5–70.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeSuzuki
TerrainModelGrand Vitara
2015Model year2014
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2393 cc
182 HPPower169 HP
233 NmTorque227 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank66 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption11,0 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,4 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption9,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
—TransmissionAutomatic
225/65 R17Tyre size17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength4060 mm
1849 mmWidth1810 mm
1684 mmHeight1695 mm
1723 KgWeight1521 kg
—Luggage capacity398 lt
2858 mmWheelbase—

Additional Features

GMC Terrain

No additional feature records are available.

Suzuki Grand VitaraDriver AirbagPassenger AirbagSide AirbagKnee AirbagABSEBDESPASRHill Start AssistCruise ControlTrip ComputerArmrestPower Rear WindowsPower Front WindowsLeather Steering WheelDigital Climate ControlIlluminated Vanity MirrorFront Fog LightsRear Fog LightsAlloy WheelsRear Parking SensorsFolding MirrorsXenon HeadlightsSunroof

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 GMC Terrain and 2014 Suzuki Grand Vitara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…