DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 GMC Terrain vs 2015 Mazda CX-5 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

68.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMazda
TerrainModelCX-5
2014Model year2015
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed192 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
182 HPPower192 HP
233 NmTorque256 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption9,3 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength4555 mm
1849 mmWidth1840 mm
1684 mmHeight1710 mm
1723 KgWeight1440 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2070 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 GMC Terrain and 2015 Mazda CX-5 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…