DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2013 GMC Terrain vs 2013 Volvo S60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeVolvo
TerrainModelS60
2013Model year2013
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,2 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
182 HPPower163 HP
233 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
71 ltFuel tank67 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength4628 mm
1849 mmWidth1865 mm
1684 mmHeight1484 mm
1723 KgWeight1582 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2013 GMC Terrain and 2013 Volvo S60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…