DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 GMC Terrain vs 2011 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Terrain

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeVolvo
TerrainModelC30
2011Model year2011
SUVBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement1984 cc
182 HPPower177 HP
233 NmTorque400 Nm
4Cylinders5

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
71 ltFuel tank60 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption7,0 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption4,0 lt
9,0 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4707 mmLength4266 mm
1849 mmWidth1782 mm
1684 mmHeight1447 mm
1723 KgWeight1451 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 GMC Terrain and 2011 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Terrain leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…