DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 GMC Sonoma vs 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Land Cruiser

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeToyota
SonomaModelLand Cruiser
2000Model year2000
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats8
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h13,6 s
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4164 cc
190 HPPower204 HP
339 NmTorque430 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
98 ltFuel tank96 lt
—Urban consumption16,1 lt
—Average consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears5
235/75 R15Tyre size275/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5215 mmLength4940 mm
1725 mmWidth1940 mm
1610 mmHeight1880 mm
1706 KgWeight2650 Kg
3122 mmWheelbase2850 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 GMC Sonoma and 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Land Cruiser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…