DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Acura RDX vs 2012 Kia Optima Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Acura RDX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.25–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura RDXSpecificationKia Optima
AcuraMakeKia
RDXModelOptima
2012Model year2012
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Acura RDXSpecificationKia Optima
7,5 s0–100 km/h—
195 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2300 ccEngine displacement2359 cc
240 HPPower194 HP
260 NmTorque245 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura RDXSpecificationKia Optima
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank70 lt
12,4 ltUrban consumption—
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,6 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura RDXSpecificationKia Optima
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
235/55 R18Tyre size215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura RDXSpecificationKia Optima
4635 mmLength4845 mm
1870 mmWidth1830 mm
1655 mmHeight1455 mm
1698 KgWeight1462 Kg
2650 mmWheelbase2795 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Acura RDX and 2012 Kia Optima approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Acura RDX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…