DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2007 GMC Sierra 1500 vs 2008 Jeep Commander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Jeep Commander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeJeep
Sierra 1500ModelCommander
2007Model year2008
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
3Seats7
2Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4701 cc
200 HPPower231 HP
353 NmTorque410 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
129 ltFuel tank78 lt
—Urban consumption19,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,2 lt
—Average consumption14,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
255/75 R16Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5161 mmLength4787 mm
1994 mmWidth1900 mm
1808 mmHeight1826 mm
1847 KgWeight2235 Kg
3023 mmWheelbase2781 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2007 GMC Sierra 1500 and 2008 Jeep Commander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Jeep Commander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…