DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Safari vs 2004 Chevrolet Astro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Astro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeChevrolet
SafariModelAstro
2005Model year2004
MinivanBody typeMinivan
8Seats8
3Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4300 cc
190 HPPower192 HP
339 NmTorque339 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank102 lt
—Urban consumption14,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption11,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears4
215/75 R15Tyre size215/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4821 mm
1968 mmWidth1969 mm
1900 mmHeight1903 mm
2083 KgWeight2025 Kg
2824 mmWheelbase2825 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Safari and 2004 Chevrolet Astro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Astro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…