DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Safari vs 2004 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.75–68.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
SafariModelExplorer
2004Model year2004
MinivanBody typeOff-road vehicle
8Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,6 s
0 km/hTop speed158 km/h
4300 ccEngine displacement4601 cc
190 HPPower242 HP
339 NmTorque382 Nm
6Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
102 ltFuel tank85 lt
—Urban consumption16,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/75 R15Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4821 mmLength4813 mm
1968 mmWidth1832 mm
1900 mmHeight1814 mm
2083 KgWeight1990 Kg
2824 mmWheelbase2890 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Safari and 2004 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…