DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 GMC Safari vs 1992 Opel Omega Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Omega

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.5–55.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeOpel
SafariModelOmega
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeSedan
5/7Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,8 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
2474 ccEngine displacement2410 cc
92 HPPower125 HP
182 NmTorque195 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,8 lt
—Average consumption8,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/75 R15Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4490 mmLength4740 mm
1956 mmWidth1760 mm
1905 mmHeight1445 mm
—Weight1330 Kg
2819 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 GMC Safari and 1992 Opel Omega approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…