DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Envoy vs 2005 Nissan Armada Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Armada

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

78.75–79.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeNissan
EnvoyModelArmada
2004Model year2005
SUVBody typeOff-road vehicle
7Seats8
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h7,3 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5328 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
290 HPPower305 HP
441 NmTorque522 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
96 ltFuel tank106 lt
—Urban consumption18,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption12,4 lt
—Average consumption15,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 Hydra-MaticGears5
245/65 R17Tyre size265/70 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5271 mmLength5255 mm
1897 mmWidth2002 mm
1917 mmHeight1913 mm
2393 KgWeight2340 Kg
3275 mmWheelbase3130 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Envoy and 2005 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…