DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 GMC Canyon vs 2004 Cadillac Escalade Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Canyon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

81.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeCadillac
CanyonModelEscalade
2009Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeEstate
5/6Seats8
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h8,0 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
5328 ccEngine displacement5328 cc
300 HPPower299 HP
434 NmTorque440 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank98 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption—
12,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 Hydra-MaticGears4
235/50 R18Tyre size265/70 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength5052 mm
1742 mmWidth2004 mm
1723 mmHeight1885 mm
1913 KgWeight2519 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2946 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 GMC Canyon and 2004 Cadillac Escalade approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Canyon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…