DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2009 GMC Canyon vs 2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Trailblazer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

81.75–82.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeChevrolet
CanyonModelTrailblazer
2009Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
5/6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
5328 ccEngine displacement5327 cc
300 HPPower294 HP
434 NmTorque441 Nm
8Cylinders8

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank96 lt
16,8 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
12,3 ltExtra-urban consumption12,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4 Hydra-MaticGears4
235/50 R18Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength5279 mm
1742 mmWidth1894 mm
1723 mmHeight1957 mm
1913 KgWeight2242 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase3277 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2009 GMC Canyon and 2004 Chevrolet Trailblazer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Trailblazer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…