DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 GMC Canyon vs 2004 Toyota Highlander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Toyota Highlander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.75–74.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeToyota
CanyonModelHighlander
2005Model year2004
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed175 km/h
3460 ccEngine displacement3311 cc
220 HPPower218 HP
305 NmTorque301 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank75 lt
—Urban consumption12,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4 Hydra-MaticGears5
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size225/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4685 mm
1742 mmWidth1825 mm
1646 mmHeight1735 mm
1860 KgWeight1680 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 GMC Canyon and 2004 Toyota Highlander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Toyota Highlander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…