DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Canyon vs 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Pajero

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMitsubishi
CanyonModelPajero
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeOff-road vehicle
6Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3460 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
220 HPPower202 HP
305 NmTorque318 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank71 lt
—Urban consumption16,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption10,5 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4 Hydra-MaticGears5
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size265/70 R16 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4280 mm
1742 mmWidth1875 mm
1646 mmHeight1845 mm
1860 KgWeight1990 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase2545 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Canyon and 2005 Mitsubishi Pajero approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Pajero leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…