DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 GMC Canyon vs 2005 Chevrolet Uplander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Chevrolet Uplander

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.75–71.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeChevrolet
CanyonModelUplander
2004Model year2005
Pick-upBody typeMinivan
6Seats7
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3460 ccEngine displacement3498 cc
220 HPPower203 HP
305 NmTorque298 Nm
5Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank95 lt
—Urban consumption13,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,5 lt
—Average consumption11,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4 Hydra-MaticGears4
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength5191 mm
1742 mmWidth1830 mm
1646 mmHeight1830 mm
1860 KgWeight2090 Kg
3198 mmWheelbase3077 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 GMC Canyon and 2005 Chevrolet Uplander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Chevrolet Uplander leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…