DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 GMC Canyon vs 2011 Volvo XC60 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Canyon

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.5–67.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeVolvo
CanyonModelXC60
2011Model year2011
Pick-upBody typeSUV
5/6Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2921 ccEngine displacement3192 cc
185 HPPower243 HP
258 NmTorque320 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
74 ltFuel tank70 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
—Average consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/75 R15; 225/70 R15Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5260 mmLength4627 mm
1717 mmWidth1891 mm
1656 mmHeight1713 mm
1668 KgWeight1810 Kg
3200 mmWheelbase2774 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 GMC Canyon and 2011 Volvo XC60 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Canyon leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…