DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Canyon vs 2016 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Volkswagen Amarok

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeVolkswagen
CanyonModelAmarok
2016Model year2016
Pick-upBody typePick-up
4Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,0-9.1 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
2776 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
181 HPPower204 HP
500 NmTorque500 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
79 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption8,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption7,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears8
265/70 R16; 255/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5395 mmLength5254 mm
1886 mmWidth1954 mm
1795 mmHeight1834 mm
2024 KgWeight2053 Kg
3258 mmWheelbase3097 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Canyon and 2016 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Volkswagen Amarok leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…