DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Acadia vs 2014 Ford Taurus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Taurus

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
AcadiaModelTaurus
2016Model year2014
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3649 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
310 HPPower365 HP
373 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6 SelectShift
245/65 R17; 235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size255/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4917 mmLength5154 mm
1915 mmWidth1935 mm
1745 mmHeight1542 mm
—Weight1970 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Acadia and 2014 Ford Taurus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Taurus leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…