DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Acadia vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
AcadiaModelExplorer
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
7Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
3649 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
310 HPPower340 HP
373 NmTorque485 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,0 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6 SelectShift
245/65 R17; 235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4917 mmLength5019 mm
1915 mmWidth1988 mm
1745 mmHeight1788 mm
2858 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Acadia and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…