DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Acadia vs 2012 Lincoln MKS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lincoln MKS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

80.75–81.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeLincoln
AcadiaModelMKS
2016Model year2012
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
7/8Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
288 HPPower355 HP
366 NmTorque475 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank72 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
—Average consumption11,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6 SelectShift
255/65 R18; 255/60 R19; 255/55 R20Tyre size255/45 R19V
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5101 mmLength5184 mm
2003 mmWidth1928 mm
1844 mmHeight1565 mm
2112 KgWeight1940 Kg
3021 mmWheelbase2868 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Acadia and 2012 Lincoln MKS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lincoln MKS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…