DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Acadia vs 2016 Ford Explorer Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford Explorer

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

80.75–81.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeFord
AcadiaModelExplorer
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
7/8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,4 s
0 km/hTop speed193 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3497 cc
288 HPPower340 HP
366 NmTorque485 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank70 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,7 lt
—Average consumption13,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears6 SelectShift
255/65 R18; 255/60 R19; 255/55 R20Tyre size255/50 R20
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5101 mmLength5019 mm
2003 mmWidth1988 mm
1844 mmHeight1788 mm
2112 KgWeight—
3021 mmWheelbase2860 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Acadia and 2016 Ford Explorer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford Explorer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…