DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2014 GMC Acadia vs 2015 Mazda CX-9 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Acadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

78.75–78.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMazda
AcadiaModelCX-9
2014Model year2015
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSUV
7/8Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3564 ccEngine displacement3726 cc
288 HPPower273 HP
366 NmTorque270 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
83 ltFuel tank76 lt
13,8 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
9,8 ltExtra-urban consumption9,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears6
255/65 R18; 255/60 R19; 255/55 R20Tyre size245/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5101 mmLength5232 mm
2003 mmWidth1935 mm
1844 mmHeight1727 mm
2112 KgWeight1958 Kg
3021 mmWheelbase2875 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2014 GMC Acadia and 2015 Mazda CX-9 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Acadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…