DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 GMC Acadia vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Acadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeMitsubishi
AcadiaModelTriton
2017Model year2017
SUV, CrossoverBody typePick-up
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
193 HPPower136 HP
255 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
72 ltFuel tank75 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption—
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6 Hydra-MaticGears5
245/65 R17; 235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4917 mmLength5280 mm
1915 mmWidth1815 mm
1745 mmHeight1780 mm
1794 KgWeight1820 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 GMC Acadia and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Acadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…