DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 GMC Acadia vs 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GMC Acadia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GMCMakeAlfa Romeo
AcadiaModelGiulia
2016Model year2016
SUV, CrossoverBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h6,6 s
0 km/hTop speed146 km/h
2457 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
193 HPPower200 HP
255 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank58 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption8,4 lt
9,0 ltExtra-urban consumption4,6 lt
—Average consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6 Hydra-MaticGears8
245/65 R17; 235/65 R18; 235/55 R20Tyre size225/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4917 mmLength4643 mm
1915 mmWidth1860 mm
1745 mmHeight1436 mm
1794 KgWeight1429 Kg
2858 mmWheelbase2820 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 GMC Acadia and 2016 Alfa Romeo Giulia approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GMC Acadia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…