DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Geo Tracker vs 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alfa Romeo 156

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.5–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

GeoMakeAlfa Romeo
TrackerModel156
1997Model year1997
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,5 s
0 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
97 HPPower120 HP
0 NmTorque144 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption11,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size185/65R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

—Length4430 mm
—Width1745 mm
—Height1415 mm
—Weight1230 Kg
—Wheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Geo Tracker and 1997 Alfa Romeo 156 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alfa Romeo 156 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…