1995 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1995Overall Score51.5/100
1995 Geo Tracker vs 1995 Seat Toledo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1995 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1995Overall Score52.25/100
WINNER
Seat Toledo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
GeoMakeSeat
TrackerModelToledo
1995Model year1995
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
97 HPPower90 HP
0 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationSeat Toledo
—Length4321 mm
—Width1662 mm
—Height1421 mm
—Weight1080 Kg
—Wheelbase2471 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1995 Geo Tracker and 1995 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…