1994 • Geo
Tracker
Geo Tracker 1.6 (97 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.5/100
1994 Geo Tracker vs 1994 Audi 80 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1994 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.6 (70 Hp) 1994Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Geo Tracker
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
51.5–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
GeoMakeAudi
TrackerModel80
1994Model year1994
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
—Seats5
—Doors4
Performance
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
—0–100 km/h14,1 s
0 km/hTop speed168 km/h
1590 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
97 HPPower70 HP
0 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
PetrolFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank66 lt
—Urban consumption9,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,5 lt
—Average consumption6,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
3Gears5
205/75 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Geo TrackerSpecificationAudi 80
—Length4405 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1395 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
—Wheelbase2545 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1994 Geo Tracker and 1994 Audi 80 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Geo Tracker leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…